XRP a Security, Bitcoin not Ponzi, CSW not Satoshi : Stephen Palley, avocat spécialisé dans la cryptographie

Anderson Kill, associé du cabinet juridique de premier plan, a fait part de son point de vue sur XRP, Bitcoin, Craig Wright et les manipulations cryptographiques des prix.

Stephen Palley est un expert chevronné sur les aspects juridiques de la chaîne de blocs et des segments de crypto. Aujourd’hui, il a partagé son point de vue sur certaines questions cruciales pour l’ensemble du secteur.

Sur les Ponzis et les valeurs mobilières

Tout d’abord, M. Palley a annoncé que le jeton XRP est, en fait, une sécurité. Il a souligné ce fait au milieu de la bataille juridique entre Ripple et la SEC américaine.

Comme l’a déjà couvert U.Today, Ripple Inc. et ses cerveaux, Chris Larsen et Brad Garlinghouse, sont accusés de vendre illégalement des titres, sous forme de jetons XRP, à des citoyens américains.

Selon les allégations de la SEC américaine, près de 1,3 milliard de dollars ont été collectés par Ripple et ses dirigeants à la suite de ventes illégales de XRP. Une autre société qui a une longue histoire de problèmes avec les régulateurs fédéraux, Tether Limited, est „corrompue à répétition“ en ce qui concerne M. Palley.

Toutefois, cela ne signifie pas que l’ensemble du segment est un foyer d’escroqueries sophistiquées. Bitcoin (BTC) n’est pas une chaîne de Ponzi, ajoute le célèbre avocat.

CSW n’est pas Satoshi

M. Palley a également mentionné un autre récit courant dans la communauté des cryptophiles. Selon lui, l’informaticien et entrepreneur australien Craig Wright n’a rien à voir avec le mystérieux inventeur de Bitcoin (BTC) Satoshi Nakamoto.

Il y a trois jours, le 24 janvier, Craig Wright a de nouveau fait la une des journaux. Il insiste sans cesse sur le fait qu’il est le seul détenteur des droits d’auteur du livre blanc de Bitcoin.

A ce titre, il a demandé à Bitcoin Core de supprimer ce document de son stockage public. Cependant, cela a provoqué un effet Streisand massif : La thèse de Nakamoto a été republiée par des dizaines de services en quelques heures. Dans sa dernière observation sur les actifs numériques, M. Palley a admis que le prix de la cryptographie est encore vulnérable à la manipulation.

Goldman Sachs Exec sier at mer institusjonelle investeringer ville roet Bitcoin

Goldman Sachs Executive sier at Bitcoin (BTC) vil stabilisere seg når flere institusjoner kommer

Jeff Currie, en Goldman Sachs toppsjef, hadde sagt at Bitcoin må ha flere institusjonelle investorer før markedet kan modnes ordentlig, i et intervju på CNBCs The Coin Rush.

Curie: Ikke nok institusjoner er involvert ennå

Jeff Currie, den globale lederen for råvareforskning ved Goldman Sachs, hadde uttalt at institusjonelle investeringer i bransjen fremdeles er små, og la til at flere institusjonelle investorer må delta aktivt for at markedet skal bli mer stabilisert.

Ifølge ham har kryptovalutamarkedet allerede vist tegn på modenhet, men det er fortsatt mye rom for forbedring. Han hevdet også at omtrent 1% av alle pengene i BTC kom fra institusjoner.

Currie bemerket også at siden gull og Bitcoin Up deler en likhet i å være en defensiv eiendel, kan førstnevnte nåværende $ 3 billion dollar markedet også bli siphoned i kryptoindustrien i nær fremtid.

„Akkurat nå har alle kryptovalutaene omtrent en billion [USD], la oss si at den vokser til $ 2 billioner, så gjør du bare den enkle matematikken – hvor mange mynter er der delt på det, og du kan ende opp med en virkelig verdi . ”

Curie bemerket at dette kan gi en langsiktig likevekt for Bitcoin. Imidlertid er eiendelen fortsatt vanskelig å forutsi på grunn av usikkerhetsnivået og volatiliteten som er knyttet til den.

Institusjonell etterspørsel etter Bitcoin og andre kryptoaktiva vokser

På baksiden hadde Gemini-medstifter tvitret det stikk motsatte av Curies holdning og sa at han var „operatør og eier“ av en kryptobørs, og at han faktisk vet at det er „enorm“ men „stille“ institusjonell etterspørsel etter Bitcoin.

Dette er helt falskt. Det er enorm institusjonell etterspørsel, og det meste er stille. Som operatør og eier av @Gemini ville jeg faktisk vite at du ikke ville. https://t.co/9487m9Bu3w

– Tyler Winklevoss (@tyler) 11. januar 2021

Og selv om Winklevoss uttalelse var en tilbakevending rettet mot Peter Schiff, ikke Curie, kan det faktisk ha mer substans enn Curies med tanke på at selv de beste institusjonene som JPMorgan er bullish på Bitcoin, og går så langt som å forutsi at den digitale eiendelen kan tjene 600 milliarder dollar i institusjonelle investeringer og stiger til $ 146 000 per mynt.

I fjor hadde toppinstitusjoner og store selskaper som Microstrategy, Grayscale, PayPal, Square, MassMutual og en rekke andre investert i Bitcoin.

Microstrategys administrerende direktør, Michael Saylor, gjentar stadig sin forpliktelse til kontinuerlig investering i Bitcoin. Han har også prøvd å bringe Elon Musk inn i folden ved å prøve å overbevise ham om å konvertere Teslas balanse til Bitcoin.

MassMutual og Square har også investert mye i Bitcoin. Faktisk eier Square over 4000 BTC mens MassMutual investerte 100 millioner dollar i kryptomarkedet.

Og uansett om Curies ord stemmer eller ikke, at det ikke er nok institusjonelle investeringer, er en ting klar: institusjonell etterspørsel etter krypto, spesielt Bitcoin, vokser.

Bitcoin, the “mother of all financial bubbles”? Bank of America is not going dead hand!

Old school – For Michael Hartnett, director of strategy for the Bank of America, the Bitcoin bullrun we live in would outperform all other financial bubbles and be “ the mother of financial bubbles ”.

But, if you are an avid reader of the Journal du Coin, you know that the mother of financial bubbles took place in 1720

The sudden rise in the price of Bitcoin since mid-December is impressive , even shocking , but this speculative euphoria hardly outclasses historic bubbles, such as dot com or subprime . The crypto-asset market does not yet have sufficient capitalization to compete with events of this magnitude.

Hartnett points to the increasingly speculative behavior of crypto investors and warns of the bursting of the “ bitcoin bubble ”. For the strategist, bitcoin’s performance – up 1000% since 2019 – portends a bubble of unprecedented magnitude , which would relegate the bubbles of the past to the rank of minor events.

Bitcoin: bubble or asset undervaluation?

Of course, it is still possible to draw a parallel between the rise in the price of Bitcoin and previous explosions in the prices of other assets. Current market conditions are unique and the rise exceptional . The rise in gold in the late 1970s, the rise of web businesses in the 1990s, and soaring house prices in the mid-2000s all resulted in huge corrections after underperforming three digits.

However, the reality is more nuanced , even if Bitcoin has just corrected by almost 20% today. I think we are seeing a revaluation of all of the area that was clearly undervalued in the eyes of the market. This is not to say that Bitcoin’s new ATH represents the fair value of the asset, but only the price in 2020 was too low compared to this theoretical fair value of the asset.

At Bitcoin, nothing fundamentally changed between 2019 and 2020 , yet institutions have been buying bitcoins for several months and this long before the price hike. The pandemic has been a catalyst for change and made many players realize the value proposition of cryptoassets .

XRP Investors Take Legal Action Over SEC Charges

XRP investors have filed a petition against the SEC citing irreparable harm.

The petitioners believe the SEC is not looking out for the best interests of investors by declaring XRP to be a security.

The value of XRP has fallen by more than 50% since the SEC brought charges against Ripple Labs and two of its executives.

For almost every common cryptocurrency available in the market, 2020 has been a big year. For the most part, 2021 looks very promising, but XRP is not.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has officially tasked Ripple Labs and two of its executives with selling more than $ 1 billion in unregistered securities. Today, former investors are suing the SEC in turn. It appears that XRP holders do not approve of the token being labeled as a security by the SEC and therefore are suing the government for the harm caused to them by these charges.

What does their legal action involve?

XRP investors who filed the petition say the SEC is not doing its best to protect U.S. investors . These investors argue in the first bullet that stating that XRP is a security is in fact serving the interests of investors. This result is the opposite of what the SEC claims to do.

In its second point, the petition states:

As chairman of the SEC, it was Jay Clayton (Clayton’s) fiduciary duty to uphold the SEC’s mission statement. Instead of protecting investors and sharing information to help them make informed decisions, the defendant knowingly and intentionally caused losses of billions of dollars to innocent investors who bought, traded, received and / or acquired the XRP digital asset, including named plaintiffs, and all others in a similar situation.

Complainants say the SEC has had nearly seven years to make an official statement or work with Ripple Lab and its executives. This delay, they say, was more than enough time for the government to act. In their eyes, it is unfair that the SEC is making these accusations now. Worse yet, this action cost investors billions of dollars in “unnecessary” losses.

The petition also claims that Jay Clayton, the head of the SEC, acted for improper motives and subjected Ripple Labs and XRP to irreparable harm. They point out that the SEC considers Bitcoin and Ether not to be securities, and argue that the same is true for XRP. They thus believe that the SEC should consider the third largest cryptocurrency in terms of market capitalization (now fourth according to Coin Gecko, a cryptocurrency market capitalization aggregator) as not being a security. In addition, they cite the use of XRP as „currency“ with over 150 applications and commercial consumption.

What is XRP?

XRP is the cryptocurrency created by Ripple, an enterprise blockchain platform intended to facilitate payments and fund transfers. The Ripple network claims to be able to conduct international transactions instantly for a fraction of the cost of the traditional money transfer system.

Until recently, Ripple has partnered with many banks. XRP was listed on almost every cryptocurrency exchange before the charges were brought against Ripple. Following this announcement, many partners and exchanges suspended their services until everything was legally settled with Ripple.

Bitcoin „Overbought“? JP Morgan Chase-Strategen scheinen so zu denken

Während die größte Kryptowährung der Welt ein neues Allzeithoch von $23.000+ erreicht, sind die institutionellen Investitionen auf dem Vormarsch!
In den letzten Monaten hat sich bitcoin auf einer Reise befunden, die wahrscheinlich in naher Zukunft weitergehen könnte.

Da die größte Kryptowährung der Welt ein neues Allzeithoch von $23,000+ erreicht, sind institutionelle Investitionen gut im Kommen! In den letzten Monaten, bitcoin hat auf einer Reise gewesen, dass es wahrscheinlich in naher Zukunft fortsetzen könnte. Das heißt, dies ist keine finanzielle Beratung und wir sind keine Finanzberater. Bitte machen Sie Ihre eigene Forschung vor der Investition in eine digitale Anlage wie bitcoin.

Tatsächlich liegt das neue Allzeithoch für bitcoin zum Zeitpunkt der Erstellung dieses Artikels bei über $24.000, aber wenn dieser Artikel live geht, wer weiß!

Einige setzen institutionelle Interesse als der Hauptgrund für bitcoin spiking so stark in seinem Wert. Zu diesem Zweck, das Bankenkonglomerat JP Morgan Chase glaubt, dass große Krypto-Fonds fließt sind ein großer Grund, wie die Zukunft von bitcoin aussehen wird.

In einem neuen Bericht von Bloomberg, Strategen des Unternehmens zeigen, dass eine deutliche Verlangsamung der Zuflüsse durch bitcoin könnte einen erheblichen Einfluss darauf haben, ob eine Korrektur auftritt.

„Überkauft“ war der Begriff, den einige der Strategen in dem Bericht in Bezug auf den führenden Krypto-Münze verwendet. Infolgedessen ist eine deutliche Verlangsamung des Kaufs des Vermögenswerts notwendig.

„Es ist schwer zu vermeiden, Bitcoin als „überkauft“ zu beschreiben, die Ströme in den Trust sind zu groß, um eine Positionsauflösung durch Momentum-Trader zu ermöglichen, um eine anhaltende negative Preisdynamik zu erzeugen.“

Die Strategen des Unternehmens fuhren fort, Grayscale und ihr gesamtes verwaltetes Vermögen hervorzuheben, das derzeit knapp über $13 Milliarden beträgt. Die Analyse zeigt, dass der Grayscale Trust monatlich Zuflüsse im Wert von $1 Milliarde verzeichnet.

Es ist in der Tat sehr neugierig, warum bitcoin hat so viel in den letzten Monat im Wert beschleunigt.

Viele Menschen haben in auf dem kometenhaften Aufstieg bitcoin kassiert hat, während andere auf den Vermögenswert gehalten haben in der Hoffnung, noch mehr Gewinn in der Zukunft zu machen!